Data Centers Intel

Data sources and methods

Each facility record combines one or more listings from the sources below. Records are matched by operator and facility code, by location and name, or by name and city. Every facility page lists the sources it came from.

OpenStreetMap

Data © OpenStreetMap contributors, available under the Open Database License (ODbL). See openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Used for: 4,688 features tagged telecom=data_center, and street-address geocoding through Nominatim.

Maps

Map tiles from OpenFreeMap, © OpenMapTiles, data from OpenStreetMap. Maps are drawn with MapLibre GL JS (BSD license).

Overture Maps

Places data from the Overture Maps Foundation (release 2026-09-23.1), available under CDLA Permissive 2.0. Some Overture records originate from Foursquare Open Source Places (Apache License 2.0; © Foursquare Labs, Inc.) and other upstream datasets, credited per record in the source data.

Used for: 1,705 places whose name identifies a data center.

Wikidata

Items from Wikidata, available under CC0 1.0.

Used for: 197 items that are instances of data center or its subclasses.

Uptime Institute

The public Uptime Institute Tier Certification and awards list.

Used for: 1,934 award entries (facility name, company, location, award type and tier).

Cloud provider location pages

Data center and cloud region lists published by the providers themselves:

Used for: 265 locations.

Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

The Data Centers in Texas lists of registered qualifying data centers and large data center projects.

Used for: 167 registered projects.

Operator websites

Facility lists published by 47 operators on their own websites.

OperatorWebsiteFacilities listed
365 Data Centers365datacenters.com16
AirTrunkairtrunk.com22
Alignedaligneddc.com37
Ascentyascenty.com34
Centersquarecsquare.com37
Chindatachindatagroup.com11
Cologixcologix.com49
Colt DCScoltdatacentres.net27
Compasscompassdatacenters.com8
CoreSitecoresite.com29
CtrlSctrls.com21
CyrusOnecyrusone.com53
DataBankdatabank.com76
Digital Realtydigitalrealty.com259
Echelonechelon-dc.com12
EdgeConneXedgeconnex.com68
Element Criticalelementcritical.com5
Equinixequinix.com274
Evocativeevocative.com13
Flexentialflexential.com42
Global Switchglobalswitch.com18
Green Mountaingreenmountain.no7
H5h5datacenters.com32
Iron Mountainironmountain.com42
Keppelkeppeldatacentres.com30
Lumenlumen.com120
NEXTDCnextdc.com28
NTT Global Data Centersservices.global.ntt71
Nxtranxtra.in88
ODATAodatadc.com12
Princeton Digital Groupprincetondg.com17
Pure DCpuredc.com9
QTSq.com50
STACK Infrastructurestackinfra.com50
STT GDCsttgdc.com68
Sabeysabeydatacenters.com7
Scalascaladatacenters.com43
Serverfarmserverfarmllc.com24
Sifysifytechnologies.com13
Switchswitch.com7
Telehousetelehouse.net27
TierPointtierpoint.com36
Vantagevantage-dc.com41
Verneverne.co5
Yondryondrgroup.com7
Yottayotta.com12
atNorthatnorth.com12

Other

  • Country, state and city boundaries and place names: Natural Earth (public domain).
  • Street-address geocoding: Nominatim with OpenStreetMap data (ODbL).
  • Fonts: Archivo and Archivo Black (SIL Open Font License).

Data last compiled 2026-09-28.

How often the data is updated

The directory is rebuilt from fresh downloads of every source, then checked by automated tests before it is published. The data on the site was compiled on 2026-09-28; every page shows this date at the bottom. Each facility page names the sources its record was built from, so you can check any listing against its original.

How records are merged

Listings from different sources are combined into one record when they describe the same facility: the same operator and facility code; the same name within a short distance; the same operator and name in the same city when one listing has only an approximate location; or the same operator and site code (for example VA1 or LD11x) within one kilometre. Listings from two different operators are never merged, even in one building, because multi-tenant buildings hold several facilities. When one record replaces another, the old page address forwards to the new one.

How records are classified

Facility type comes from the source: operators' own lists and recognized colocation brands give colocation; sites owned by Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Apple and Oracle are hyperscaler; providers' region lists give cloud region; named organizations that run their own site (banks, universities, public bodies, and Uptime-certified companies that are not colocation providers) are enterprise. 3,003 of 8,251 records (36%) have no type in their sources and are shown as unclassified, mostly map points with no operator.

Status (operational, under construction, planned, announced, closed) comes from the operator's own wording or from OpenStreetMap lifecycle tags; the published wording is shown next to it. Capacity is shown only as published, labelled with what it measures (IT load, utility power, or a whole campus) when the source says so. The building footprint is the area of the building's outline in OpenStreetMap, not a published floor area.

Facility descriptions

The paragraph at the top of a facility page is written by a language model (Anthropic's Claude) from that page's record only: the operator, place, status, capacity, certification, footprint, filings, sources and neighboring facilities shown on the page. Before a description is published it is checked automatically against the record: every figure, name, status and rank in it must appear in the record, and descriptions that repeat one another are rejected. A description that fails is written once more; if it fails again, the page keeps a paragraph assembled from the record's fields instead. Descriptions are rewritten only when the record changes.

Known gaps

Out of 8,251 listed facilities: 2,073 (25%) have no operator recorded, 4,526 (55%) have no street address, 2,829 (34%) have no exact location (only a city or area center, or none), and 6,839 (83%) have no published capacity. 897 have no city; for 1,698 others the city was taken from the coordinates, which the facility page says. 1,202 records (15%) combine listings from two or more sources, and 2,817 (34%) have a mapped building outline in OpenStreetMap.

Coverage is most complete where operators publish their own facility lists and where OpenStreetMap is mapped in detail. It is weakest where operators publish only city names: among countries with at least 40 listings, the highest shares without an exact location are in China (74% without an exact location), Colombia (67% without an exact location), Hong Kong (61% without an exact location), Indonesia (58% without an exact location) and Thailand (58% without an exact location). Several large operators in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong do not publish machine-readable facility lists, so those markets are under-counted.

1,742 records are listed by name on their city, state or country page but have no page of their own, because such a page would carry too little information (for example no name, or no operator, address or capacity), or because the record may not be a data center or is reported closed. 637 unnamed map points with no operator and no address are kept in the data but have no page.

Corrections

If a listing is wrong, use the contact form (every facility page has a "Report an error" link that fills in the page address). Corrections are checked against the sources and applied in the next rebuild; operators can also ask for a listing to be corrected or removed.